Thursday, February 19, 2009
Begging For Tomorrow To Come
So, I have a scenario. A woman is on trial for killing, say, her brother. Now, she's also being charged with 15 other counts of murder because the killing was in the same style as serial killings. And during the trial, it comes out that the first person killed was this guy. His name isn't important. Several days after the man is killed, his wife commits suicide. We'll say that her same is Lisa Amon. But, see, the prosecutor is actually the serial killer. And she's framing the other woman for the crimes. How would you get from point A (woman on trial) to point B (prosecutor being charged with crime)? It's for a civics project, so I'd appreciate ideas.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Wait... I don't get it... She killed her brother, and the wife? or the wife killed the guy??? or she killed them all? im confused...
well, probably finding a way to prove that the defendant was no where near the crimes at any time and not conected to them either, and that the woman on the prosecuting side was indeed connected to the murders, but actually wouldn't the state be the prosecutors? they would be.. so all you could prove is that the defendant is innocent and that another suspect must be found, ergo they would then approach the other woman who could in fact be the murderer... so really all you need is some good evidence, and some kick ass lawyers... well unless of course this is a civil trial, then it would be set up as a law suit with a person on each side, but im guessing its not...
Post a Comment